Current:Home > StocksJudge dismisses lawsuit by Musk’s X against nonprofit researchers tracking hate speech on platform -Zenith Investment School
Judge dismisses lawsuit by Musk’s X against nonprofit researchers tracking hate speech on platform
View
Date:2025-04-18 23:19:11
A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit by Elon Musk’s X Corp. against the non-profit Center for Countering Digital Hate, which has documented the increase in hate speech on the site since it was acquired by the Tesla owner.
X, formerly known as Twitter, had argued the center’s researchers violated the site’s terms of service by improperly compiling public tweets, and that its subsequent reports on the rise of hate speech cost X millions of dollars when advertisers fled.
On Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer dismissed the suit, writing in his order that it was “unabashedly and vociferously about one thing” — punishing the nonprofit for its speech.
X had alleged that the nonprofit “scraped” its site for data, which is against its terms of service. But the judge found that X failed to “allege losses based on technological harms” — that is, the company didn’t show how the scraping led to financial losses for X.
X had sought millions of dollars in damages, arguing that the nonprofit’s reports led to the exodus of advertisers and the loss of ad revenue.
But the judge agreed with CCDH’s argument saying X cannot seek damages for the independent acts of third parties based on CCDH’s reports, or its “speech.”
The center is a nonprofit with offices in the U.S. and United Kingdom. It regularly publishes reports on hate speech, extremism or harmful behavior on social media platforms like X, TikTok or Facebook. The organization has published several reports critical of Musk’s leadership, detailing a rise in anti-LGBTQ hate speech as well as climate misinformation since his purchase.
In a statement posted to X, the social media platform said it “disagrees with the court’s decision and plans to appeal.”
Imran Ahmed, the center’s founder and CEO, said the lawsuit amounted to a “hypocritical campaign of harassment” by a billionaire who talks about protecting free speech but who then uses his wealth to try to silence his critics. He said the lawsuit shows the need for a federal law requiring tech companies to release more information about their operations, so that the public can understand how these powerful platforms are shaping society.
“We hope this landmark ruling will embolden public-interest researchers everywhere to continue, and even intensify, their vital work of holding social media companies accountable for the hate and disinformation they host and the harm they cause,” said Ahmed.
Roberta Kaplan, the center’s attorney, said the dismissal of X’s suit shows “even the wealthiest man cannot bend the rule of law to his will.”
“We are living in an age of bullies, and it’s social media that gives them the power that they have today,” Kaplan said in an email to reporters. “It takes great courage to stand up to these bullies; it takes an organization like the Center for Countering Digital Hate. We are proud and honored to represent CCDH.”
The center is not the only group that has pointed to the rise of hateful material on X since Musk’s purchase in October 2022. Last November, several big advertisers including IBM, NBCUniversal and its parent company Comcast, said that they stopped advertising on X after a report from the liberal advocacy group Media Matters said their ads were appearing alongside material praising Nazis. It was yet another setback as X tries to win back big brands and their ad dollars, X’s main source of revenue. X has also sued Media Matters.
Later that month, Musk went on an expletive-ridden rant in response to advertisers that halted spending on X in response to antisemitic and other hateful material, saying they are are engaging in “blackmail” and, using a profanity, essentially told them to go away.
veryGood! (1118)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Explosive devices detonated, Molotov cocktail thrown at Washington, D.C., businesses
- South Dakota Backs Off Harsh New Protest Law and ‘Riot-Boosting’ Penalties
- New Study Shows a Vicious Circle of Climate Change Building on Thickening Layers of Warm Ocean Water
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Dismissing Trump’s EPA Science Advisors, Regan Says the Agency Will Return to a ‘Fair and Transparent Process’
- Vanderpump Rules' Tom Sandoval Eviscerated for Low Blow About Sex Life With Ariana Madix
- Why Kim Cattrall Says Getting Botox and Fillers Isn't a Vanity Thing
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Explosive devices detonated, Molotov cocktail thrown at Washington, D.C., businesses
Ranking
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Taylor Taranto, Jan. 6 defendant arrested with 2 guns and machete near Obama's D.C. home, to remain detained
- Transcript: Former Vice President Mike Pence on Face the Nation, July 2, 2023
- Full transcript of Face the Nation, July 2, 2023
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- At Flint Debate, Clinton and Sanders Avoid Talk of Environmental Racism
- Power Plants on Indian Reservations Get No Break on Emissions Rules
- Mom influencer Katie Sorensen sentenced to jail for falsely claiming couple tried to kidnap her kids at a crafts store
Recommendation
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
Jackie Miller James' Sister Shares Update After Influencer's Aneurysm Rupture
An Unusual Coalition of Environmental and Industry Groups Is Calling on the EPA to Quickly Phase Out Super-Polluting Refrigerants
Fracking’s Costs Fall Disproportionately on the Poor and Minorities in South Texas
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
Lala Kent Addresses Vanderpump Rules Reunion Theories—Including Raquel Leviss Pregnancy Rumors
The Petroleum Industry May Want a Carbon Tax, but Biden and Congressional Republicans are Not Necessarily Fans
What the BLM Shake-Up Could Mean for Public Lands and Their Climate Impact